Preventing abuse of authority is necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
In other words, political maneuvering in the Executive office as well as the Legislative office should not be permitted to displace or hamper, proper judicial review and justice.
Currently, if it can be proven in a court of law that Barack Hussein Obama knew, at the time he declared himself a presidential candidate, that he was not born in the United States, that he has deliberately misrepresented himself as a natural born citizen, and that he has spent over a million dollars perpetuating a lie to the American people, a charge of treason and criminal fraud would be the only appropriate action to be brought against the man.
Mr. Obama, according to a published report, has spent over one million dollars so far to STOP anyone from seeing ANY of his actual identification documents, such as:
His actual long-form birth certificate (NOT an easily-forged electronic copy of a short-form document that is not even officially accepted as proof of birth by the State of Hawaii)
His passport files
His University of Chicago Law School scholarly articles
His Harvard Law School records
His Columbia University records
His Columbia University senior thesis, "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament"
His Occidental College records, including information on any financial aid that he received
His Punahou School records, where Mr. Obama attended from the fifth grade until he finished high school
His Noelani Elementary School records, where he attended kindergarten (according to the Hawaii Department of Education, students must submit a birth certificate to register -- but parents may bring a passport or student visa if the child is from a foreign country)
His Complete files and schedules of his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004
Mr. Obama's client list from during his time in private practice with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard
His Illinois State Bar Association records
His Baptism records
The Obama/Dunham marriage license
The Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
His adoption records
I wonder (on a daily basis) why Judge Carter has been the only federal judge, prior to and subsequent to the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States, to consider the requirement set forth in the U.S. Constitution, for the President to be a natural born citizen, as a law that should be enforced. After all, all federal judges take the same oath:
"I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
In addition, each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office. Section 8 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, as amended in 1990:
"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (name of position) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
Judge Carter's statement, that, as a former U.S. Marine, he realizes the importance of a person being constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President, indicates his apparent willingness to see that constitutional law is properly administered and followed in his court. His actions seem to reflect the statement by the great John Adams, that "we are a nation of laws, and not of men."
Judge Carter stated the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on procedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS.
Where are the judges who I have to assume took the same oath as Judge Carter; likewise, where are all of the Attorney Generals, sheriffs, and members of Congress and our Supreme Court Justices who I know (on my sacred honor) have been sent all the evidence? Where are they?
This is precisely what happened in Nazi Germany, when, supposedly, honorable judges, who had assumed their duties prior to Adolf Hitler's assumption of power, allowed themselves to become servants of the evil Nazi Party, in order to keep their jobs. There are quite a few historical examples of lawsuits that were brought by law-abiding German men and women, between 1936 and 1942, against Adolf Hitler and his thugs, which were quickly dismissed on a basis of Hitler's sovereign, all powerful, immunity.
I wait and see if Judge Carter will be up to the task (honor) of upholding our Constitution and defending her against all enemies foreign and domestic. Judge Carter, if you are listening you may just be our Republic’s and the worlds last legal hope on this issue; please do not take that lightly. Please take it on your sacred honor!
We The People are supporting you.
Posts
